Interesting Tech Projects
The Progress of Linux
Back in 1998 I tried installing RedHat 6 on a spare PC. When the desktop loaded it was, ummm, wobbly. I then spent the best part of the next two weeks fighing with X configuration files setting obscure items such as front and back porches in a futile attempt to stabilize the display so it would be usable. I gave up.
Fast forward to March 2011 and Ubuntu 10.10. I’ve used lots of different versions of Ubuntu since 2006 on a variety of machines including for CNC control, but the last time I installed in a dual boot system was two years ago. Ubuntu 10.10 works fine in a virtual machine inside Windows 7 but I wanted to run it at full speed.
I had a blank PC with two hard drives, both blank and installed Windows 7 on the first one. That went fine.
Next I installed Ubuntu 10.10 on the second blank drive choosing the option to install “alongside another operating system”. That’s when it went pear-shaped of course.
The first issue was when I was prompted to reboot. That produced a cascade of errors saying the hard drive that it just installed on wasn’t accessible. Eh? Then it stopped and I had to use the reset button.
Upon booting there was no grub bootloader! It went straight to Ubuntu. OK, fine. I know where /boot/grub/menu.lst is so this will be easy to fix. No such luck. Things have obviously changed and now I am back in 1998 searching web pages for possible solutions on how to avoid reinstalling Windows 7.
First attempt: gedit /etc/default/grub. Oops. Obscure error time again.
Second attempt: I know nano and at least that worked giving me access to the file. Sadly the contents of the file don’t show any references to kernels like I expected.
Third attempt: apt-get install startupmanager. Looks good. Shows Ubuntu as the only option though. No way to add additional operating systems – how useless is that?
The last issue I noticed is that Ubuntu failed to detect I had two monitors and stretch the desktop automatically. This is after installing the proprietary ATI drivers. I remember the Linux Action Show complaining of this exact issue with Ubuntu over two years ago!
At this point I am fed up and regretting venturing back into the Ubuntu world. I don’t want to spend hours working out how to get access back to Windows 7. Perhaps I am too stupid to use it?
If this is how the user experience is after years of hard work then I can’t see how Linux will ever make any significant gain on the desktop.
Some things never change.
Print article | This entry was posted by Andy on March 4, 2011 at 4:51 am, and is filed under Linux. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed. |
Comments are closed.
about 13 years ago
Does Windows give you the same option? I mean, does it allow you to install side-by-side with Linux or MacOS for example? When you think about such complex setup, you should have enough guts to manage it. Don’t blame the installer for its failure to go with your complexities.
From your story, it seems like your ultimate goal was to get back to Windows (or using them side by side) instead of actually settling down with Linux. In that case, you fit best with Windows. Linux is not for you. I am sorry!
Oh, although it’s out of context now, for your dual display problem, feel free to blame ATI. You could have much better luck with the open-source xf86 ATI driver.
about 13 years ago
I think you are missing the point. Linux on the desktop currently has a relatively small user base. If it is to increase then side-by-side installation with Windows should work reliably for the vast majority of situations. Instead of spending time messing around with music player settings and icons, companies like Canonical should invest in reliable installers. I disagree that my setup is complex.
My ultimate goal was side-by-side installation for testing my desktop-based software on both Windows and Linux. I’m a long time Debian user on servers. I’m perfectly capable of spending hours in a shell fixing problems, but this is 2011 and I don’t feel I should have to do that anymore.
If the open-source ATI driver works much better then why doesn’t the installer detect my hardware and use it automatically?